Sunday, May 31, 2009

Best Hair Transplant Doctors In Hyderabad

Computer graphics




draw is not enough when you want to build directly on the desktop. Of course you can always draw with a pencil and paper and then "scan" the work to transfer it to PC but I mean ONLY draw on computer ...
Here we see that - if we have become skilled in using the mouse - our hand is struggling to find the delicacy of the drawing. The solution is to buy a graphics tablet. At Christmas 2008 my son and my stepdaughter gave me one of these tablets.
I give you examples in the result.
The shadows are part of a "layer" different (specialists understand ...), This allows - possibly - to titrate the intensity.

Sunday, May 24, 2009

Can Ringworm Damage Hair Growth

CONTENTS AND LINKS

HISTORY


ROMAN ART (1) CHAPTER 1: THE ARCHITECTURE ROMAN
ROMAN ART (2) CHAPTER 2. THE ROMAN SCULPTURE
GOTHIC ART (1) CHAPTER 3. GOTHIC ARCHITECTURE
ART GOTHIC (2) CHAPTER 4. GOTHIC SCULPTURE: FEATURES
GOTHIC ART (3) CHAPTER 4. GOTHIC SCULPTURE: ICONOGRAPHY 1. FORM 2. CONTENT
GOTHIC ART (4) CHAPTER 5 THE INTERNATIONAL AND GOTHIC RENAISSANCE IN THE NORTH, S XV (OR FLEMISH PRIMITIVES).
RENAISSANCE (1) CHAPTER 6. THE RENAISSANCE IN ITALY: THE PERSPECTIVE
RENAISSANCE (2) CHAPTER 7. THE RENAISSANCE IN ITALY: THE CLASSICAL RENAISSANCE: XIV-XV centuries.
THE RENAISSANCE (3) CHAPTER 8. AN ARTIST OF THE RENAISSANCE: Leonardo da Vinci (1452 - 1519)
THE RENAISSANCE (4) CHAPTER 9. THE PAINTERS OF THE RENAISSANCE CLASSICAL (XIV-XV ° S)
RENAISSANCE (5) CHAPTER 10. RENAISSANCE WAY XVI ° S
REVIVAL (6) CHAPTER 11. RENAISSANCE WAY XVI ° S: ARTISTS
THE XVII CENTURY (1) CHAPTER 12 THE REFORMED PAINTING: THE XVII CENTURY NETHERLANDS
THE XVII CENTURY (2) CHAPTER 14. THE CLASSICS: The XVII CENTURY
THE XVII CENTURY (3) CHAPTER 14 (continued) baroque and classicism: the XVII CENTURY: THE ARTISTS


PARENTHESE: ICONOGRAPHY


ICONOGRAPHY (1 & 2) ICONOGRAPHY IE 1 CHAPTER 15: THE SAINTS 2: THE PROPHETS
ICONOGRAPHY (3) CHAPTER 16 ICONOGRAPHY IE 3: mythological heroes
ICONOGRAPHY (4 & 5) CHAPTER 17 ICONOGRAPHY IE 4: THE SCENES FREQUENTLY
CHAPTER 18: ICONOGRAPHY 5: THE NUDE


REPEAT OF HISTORY


THE XVIII CENTURY (1) CHAPTER 19 THE ROCOCO - CHAPTER 20 THE "GENDER moralize '
THE XVIII CENTURY (2 ) CHAPTER 21 THE NATURE MORTECHAPITRES 22 & 23 Neoclassicism
THE XVIII CENTURY (3) CHAPTER 24 THE SCULPTURE NEOCLASSIC
THE XVIII CENTURY (4) CHAPTER 25 Neoclassicism . (End)
CHAPTER 26 THE ROMANCE (1)
THE XIX CENTURY (1) CHAPTER 26 THE ROMANCE (2)
CHAPTER 27 IN THE MARGINS OF ROMANCE: Pre-Raphaelite & Symbolism
THE XIX CENTURY (2) CHAPTER 28 THE NATURALISM REALISM AND THE
THE XIX CENTURY (3) CHAPTER 29 IMPRESSIONISM
THE XIX CENTURY (4) CHAPTERS 29 & 30: IMPRESSIONISM (2) Cezanne ( 1)
THE XIX CENTURY (5 ° CHAPITRE31: THE NEW WORLD OF THE PAINT 1. CONSTRUCTION OF SPACE (1): CEZANNE
THE XX CENTURY (1) CHAPTER 32: THE NEW WORLD OF PAINTING 2. COLOR: Fauvism
CHAPTER 32: Expressionism
THE XX CENTURY (2) CHAPTER 33: THE NEW WORLD OF THE PAINT 3. SPACE: cubism (1)
THE XX CENTURY (3) CHAPTER 33: THE NEW WORLD OF THE PAINT 3. SPACE: cubism (2)
THE XX CENTURY (4) CHAPTER 34: THE NEW WORLD OF THE PAINT (3). SPACE (3) MATISSE AND PICASSO
THE XX CENTURY (5) CHAPTER 34 (continued) THE NEW WORLD OF THE PAINT (3). SPACE (3) MATISSE AND PICASSO (2).
THE XX CENTURY (6) CHAPTER 35 & 36: THE NEW WORLD OF THE PAINT (4): abstract art, Surrealism.
THE XX CENTURY (7) CHAPTER 37 THE REVOLUTION DUCHAMP
THE XX CENTURY (8) CHAPTER 38 Abstract Expressionism (1) 1942-1952
THE XX CENTURY (9) CHAPTER 38 (continued) Abstract Expressionism: SECOND GENERATION
THE XX CENTURY (10) CHAPTER 39A END OF AVANT GARDE: TOWARDS A NEW "REALISM": THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THE ARTIST.
THE XX CENTURY (11) CHAPTER 40 NEW REALISTIC
THE XX CENTURY (12) CHAPTER 41 THE POP ART
THE XX CENTURY (13 ) CHAPTER 42 Hyperrealism
THE XX CENTURY (14) CHAPTER 43: THE KILLING OF THE PAINT: BMPT (1967); SUPPORT / SURFACE (1969 - 1972), GRAV (1960 - 1968).
THE XX CENTURY (15) CHAPTER 44: THE DESTRUCTION OF THE OBJECT (1): Minimalism
THE XX CENTURY (16) CHAPTER 45 THE DESTRUCTION OF SUBJECT (2): CONCEPTUAL ART
THE XX CENTURY (17) CHAPTER 46. BODY ART AND perormance
THE XX CENTURY (18) CHAPTER 47 LAND EARTH ART AND ART
THE XX CENTURY (19) CHAPTER 48 THE "BACK" IN FIGURE
THE XX CENTURY (20) CHAPTER 49 THE POSTMODERNISM
XX & XXI CENTURY (1) CHAPTER 50 THE ART CONTEXTUAL
XX & XXI CENTURY (2) CHAPTER 51 THE CONTEMPORARY PAINTING (1)
XX & XXI EILC ° S (3) CHAPTER 52 THE CONTEMPORARY PAINTING (2)
XX & XXI CENTURY (4) CHAPTER 53 THE CONTEMPORARY PAINTING (3)

SCHEDULE



THE enigmatic woman
THE SHOUT
USAGE POLICY Neoclassicism: NAZI AND STALINISM


BIBLIOGRAPHY: LIST OF WORKS CONSULTED

Hanging Systems For Clothes

PROGRAM OF THE SECOND YEAR (2009-2010)


1.The Impressionist and Post-Impressionists.

2.Matisse and Picasso: from Fauvism to Cubism.

3.The abstract art.

4.Dada and the Surrealists.

5.La Revolution Duchamp


Mediafire Pokemon Soul Silver Rom

THE XX CENTURY CHAPTER 29 IMPRESSIONISM

CHAPTER 29 IMPRESSIONISM
Jacques rouveyrol




I. REALISM AND IMPRESSIONISM

1. The realism is Courbet Courbet and only
.

realism: it is less the representation of reality that transportation in the paint that was previously only mentioned by her.
This table is not a naked woman but the desire of the painter who painted it. (See Course 30, Chapter 29 Realism, III. Courbet, 3. Energy)

Thus, paradoxically, away from the realism of the painting representation. Led (eventually) in abstraction.


2. Impressionism is the heir to the realism.

a. By the subjects it addresses: Work ( Caillebotte The Floor Scrapers ), leisure (Bazille Summer Scene ), modernity (The series of twelve Monet Gare Saint-Lazare ).

b. But we must guard against a misunderstanding. While realism would goal merely a reproduction of reality, subjective impressionism would , under the "impression", varies from one individual to another.
The difference lies elsewhere: in a detachment from the performance.

* • classical picture depicts a scene of life heroic or banal. It is an image.
* • The canvas (or wood or plaster), painting, the trace of brush disappear before the scene depicted. Image of a girl in Vermeer.





* • The table shows the realistic energy of the artist shaping his subject, dealing with the material (canvas, paint brush). It is more paint that picture


* • The table which works by Impressionist work almost hides it represents the art of representation it uses.

• The impressionist painting still away from the object. It approximates the paint ... . This example shows that this detail of Monet painting Bathing at Grenouillère .




II. BIRTH OF MODERN ART: MANET


A. THE IMAGE PAINTING THE FORM

Table inaugural modern painting: Manet Olympia 1863


1. Against the imaginary painting

a. In its subject Manet's painting refers to the tradition of extended Venus and particularly the Venus of Urbino by Titian .

b. But in Manet's treatment highlights the specificity (almost unbelievable) of the table which included Titian's Venus at the surface of the canvas in a space that is not compatible with the rest of the table (the maids and trunk). The Olympia Manet shows a woman's body reduced to a surface and treated as such. A
identifies delimits the body. The modeling is reduced to its simplest expression. Painting proceeds by aplats .






only important assembly of colors on the surface of the canvas. The scandal of the Olympia is what portion of image to painting. A "autonomy of painting" (Malraux)


2. Against the imaginary reality

a. The Venus of Urbino expresses something: a gentle unreal - or lost. She does not see what it looks

. Olympia looks. On the one hand look who watch. One enters a world real.






b. Olympia recovered (awake). The dog Venus rose as well (and was changed into a cat). Olympia is the moment of metamorphosis : transition from the unreal to real. Music in the Tuileries
of the year 1863 caused a scandal in the same way because we see men in jackets and top hats, costume too unconventional painting. The Luncheon on the Grass , the same year, shocked for the same reason: a naked woman (as Olympia), men in jackets (like the Tuileries).



3. Against the imaginary painting .

Already in Music in the Tuileries, the depth is restricted to a small triangle of sky. In Le Bal de l'Opera, Manet same as in The Execution of Emperor Maximilian a balcony or wall bring everything to the forefront. Surface.
In addition, no curve, but straight horizontal and vertical. All lines seem to follow the edges of the frame or chassis as, later, in a part of the production of Frank Stella (such as the Gran Caïro 1962).
Better yet. Sometimes it's the frame of the canvas itself, which appears in the drawing. As The Port of Bordeaux of Manet with the intersection of masts and spars of vessels. This work supports ordinary paint will be current Supports / Surfaces between 1969 and 1972, even Buren.


3. Against reality.

a. A Manet About Olympia, is accused of realism too. Understand: the case against him is in fact an idealization not enough. This woman is a Venus.
b. But this is not the image of a woman. Certainly, if one has regard only to the subject: it is a real woman. But back to the surface of the canvas, the subject does not count. Things to see what are, in the words themselves of Maurice Denis, colors on a canvas assemblies.

So, with his Olympia, Manet broke with all tradition that runs from the Renaissance to Courbet understood.

-He broke with the Olympus, with respect to the subject. He broke with the majestic monument painting-sculpture-architecture. He comes to real .

- He refuses illusion invented by the "shadow painting" (Malraux), inaugurated by Leonardo da Vinci. And this is even more important.
He wants us to come see not a landscape, not a woman lying, not a portrait, not a story, but ... a table.

This does not tell us quite clearly what Olympia is an impressionist canvas.


III. BIRTH OF MODERN ART: MANE


B. THE HISTORY THE CONTEMPORARY WORLD : CONTENT





Another scandal inaugural modern painting, the same year 1863 Luncheon on the Grass.

a. The reference to tradition is all more present than it is this tradition that he is upset. Reference, therefore, to Titian's Pastoral Concert and a Judgement of Paris Raphael, via an engraving by Marcantonio Raimondi.
b. But the idealization, again, is lacking. The problem is the familiar, the nude in a landscape.
* Classically, the problem is resolved in the nude in question derealizing: goddess, nymph or biblical character.
* The Women Bathers Courbet although deemed "too real" is however, precisely, a bather. So, not a woman real. She is a woman clad in a costume consisting of the pictorial tradition.
* The woman in the foreground of Lunch Manet, is none of that. It's a naked woman. It is conceivable
still in an interior: the example of Ingres odalisque. But, outside and in addition with men dressed and most importantly in contemporary dress, a nude woman, in these circumstances can only be a prostitute.

In summary:

Impressionism Manet is realistic in its content. The subject is no longer borrowed from tradition. It is the refusal of idealization .

Impressionism Manet, as it rejects both the reality of the subject that the image that claims to give the paint. It is the refusal of illusion . This

for Manet to paint a painting and not to represent something.

From that moment they say: "A Manet, a Pissarro, Picasso, a Rembrandt, a Raphael, etc..)".

But how Luncheon on the Grass Is an impressionist canvas?

Precisely this ambiguity

A painting that is not abstract (completely unrepresentative, non-image), which still has a subject.

same time, a painting which denies any value on this transcendent, timeless ideal, so that paint yet.
A moment of relaxation ( Women in Monet's Garden ), rest ( View Village Bazille), waiting ( The Dance Review Degas), distraction ( Railroad Manet), progress ( La Gare Saint-Lazare Monet), a time of day ( The Poplars on the Epte Monet yet).


Impressionism, that's it, basically. Outside the process (which we will come), is the historical significance of this trend: to be the time when a world is unstable in another.

Impressionism is the history of painting at a time of transition between:

- classical art from the Renaissance to which the subject (hero) is everything and nothing in the form (which must fade to take place for the illusion)

- abstract art which defines the entire contemporary art, in which the subject is nothing (that was not cleared to place the illusion) and shape at all (you should see the paint is paint).




IV. TOPICS IMPRESSIONISTS

painting of the moment, the contemporary is not new. The Dutch genre painting of the XVII is such a painting.
It is also at work among naturalists of the nineteenth century.
Both in the same realistic XIX: Courbet, Daumier, Millet. But the subjects

impressionists are different: * It

first city life: The public gardens ( Music Tuileries Manet, Le Moulin de la Galette Renoir cafes ( A Bar at the Folies Bergere Manet, Degas Absinthe ) entertainment ( Lydia in a Loge Mary Cassatt, The Opera Ball Manet), the streets ( Paris on a rainy day Caillebotte, the series of Pissarro Boulevard Montmartre )


* It then life "in the country" but is still a city life, not a lives of peasants (naturalistic version): Swimming (Bazille Summer Scene); canoeing (different canoes, Caillebotte) the taverns and restaurants ( Lunch at a party boat Renoir, Monet The Grenouillère ) races ( Horses front of the stands Degas); lunches on the Grass (Manet, Monet).


* There are exceptions "naturalists," as that Pissarro painted the countryside willingly. But if the subject is naturalistic, treatment is not.


What is the treatment impressionist?


V. TREATMENT IMPRESSIONIST

impressionistic treatment consists in the fact that the subject "fades" to the form button.

1. Button.




a. In this Beach at Trouville by Monet, art shows itself as artifice. The key is to see. There is nothing there as a naturalist.


b. The Impressionist is a vibration of light .




In the classical painting, the light diffuses . It is is incidental to a revelation of the subject it illuminates. In Impressionism, light vibrates . Is that it is itself the subject paint. Thus, in these R Egadi Monet at Argenteuil.

c. Now the light is there, in the material, less material, more abstract.

When Hegel (German philosopher of the XIX century) traces the history of art by giving it a sense, he pointed out that the first art of a fledgling civilization is always the architecture most material form ( the least spiritual) art, the most subservient to laws outside the spirit (gravity, for example), the least free. Then, as the mind develops, as civilization develops, we move to the sculpture, yet taken in the matter, certainly, but spiritualized by him: the man. Then comes the painting where no more is done in the "paperless" since from three to two dimensions (area) and since this one paints, finally, is this part of the material that is most subtle, almost the least material: light. Next music where the material is reduced to the sound wave invisible. Finally, the poetry where the material yields to the meaning of words, pure expression of the Spirit. While for Hegel the meaning of "abstract / concrete 'is opposite to that in which we hear them here. The fact remains that in the treatment of his subjects Impressionism represents a step toward abstraction.



This work by Kandinsky also seems to show that the abstraction is, at least in part, expanded use of that key.

2. Frame.

a. It is inspired by photography (not copied because the snapshot does not exist yet).
b. It is pre-film (such as when a dolly or a pano-ramic).



c. It is full of movement (a movement but the look more than the subject).




To my knowledge, it meets only in Courbet, and once only, in The Origin of Life , this type of framework that cuts a part of the topic traditional or integrated or off the field.
But unlike in Courbet where one is supposed to dwell on the ground, rather it is a passing glance as we must framing Impressionist. A detached view, casual. A look flaneur, a dandy.
It describes this look as Baudelaire: a look at both curious (which goes retail) and seconded (who is not interested in most). One look good on modern life must be, in turn, only about art.


3. The series




a. The series (here the series of Monet wheels) is primarily a painting of light and its variations.
b. Then it (corollary) the assertion of a lack of interest in the subject (only the light it absorbs or scatters differently at different times, concerns the painter) is a step towards abstraction.
c is finally a research work. Doubtless in the past (for Venice Canaletto, Constable for Salisbury, for example), it was painted the same subject at different times. But it was because the subject always had an interest. Even if, moreover, the light could be painted Venetian for itself, was in a diffused light treatment and not in an Impressionist light treatment vibrant.
Impressionism seeks new possibilities of painting.


In summary, Impressionism:


1. Completes a revolution started with realism: he turns his back on the world of art and painting him into the real world.


2. Start a revolution news: he turns his back to art as a representation of the real world (or ideal) made it happen and the painting itself. This is the revolution that led to: a.


A abstraction.

b. A contemporary art.

ANNEX: KEY Impressionist painters



1. MANET Edouard 1832-1883

2. Claude Monet 1840 - 1926

3. Pissarro Camille 1830 - 1903

4. BAZILLE Frederick 1841 - 1870

5. Pierre-Auguste Renoir 1841 - 1919

6. Edgar Degas 1834 - 1917

7. Caillebotte Gustave 1848 - 1894

8. Morisot Berthe 1841 - 1895

9. Cassatt Mary 1844 - 1929

10 SISLEY Alfred from 1839 to 1899


White Pizza Unhealthy

THE CHAPTERS XX ° S 29 & 30 IMPRESSIONISM (continued) Cezanne (1) The Twentieth

CHAPTERS 29 & 30: IMPRESSIONISM (2) Cezanne (1)
Jacques rouveyrol

I . THE REVOLUTION OF 1863

1.Before 1863, the association of red and blue refers to the mantle of the Virgin . After 1863, the two colors are in mutual relations.

2. Before 1863, it was visions of (fantasies) Venus stretched out in a landscape, ranking woman in a linen closet, Diana bathing ... After 1863, we see (table book a perception.

3 Before 1863, represents something that is also (Olympus, in a kind imagined), before (in a close or distant past), in a present that reminds past. After 1863, this something that is here (of Women in the Garden), now (a Paris street in the rain), in short, a present that is present.

4. It's the naturalistic landscape that favored the passage by focusing on real Now that does not tell a story.


5. The problem then becomes: how manifest presence of the sensible? Several methods are used.

a. The choice of elements . The imperfect body Olympia (rather than the perfect body but an imaginary Venus) brings to our world.
b. The refusal of perspective breaks the illusion of a foreign reality.
c. The ability to remove the frame (after framing of original photography inspired) avoids locking up the paint in a world completely alien to ours.

6. Before 1863, the painting is finished . Any trace of brush is erased. The table is seen as closely far. After 1863, the painting is unfinished . The trace of the brush, the knife is visible and the picture is visible from afar. So close, but not as far. Otherwise .

7. Before 1863, there to see a picture . After 1863, the trace of the hand creating a new world.

8. Before 1863, we extract nature of models, ideal for giving contemplate. After 1863 there shows a reality that is neither a perfect nor a model.

9. Before 1863, the painting has a sense provided you do not see it (if it gives way to what it represents). After 1863, it only makes sense because we see it.




II. THE INFLUENCE OF JAPANESE ART PRINTS.

1. With impressionism, painting detaches from the outside world it is no longer an accessory.
The discovery of Japanese art is not foreign to this transformation.
2. These are the images of ukiyo-e ("pictures of the floating world") that marked the painters of the late nineteenth. These prints are the result of an evolution of genre painting business at the end of the sixteenth century Japan.
3.Quatre leading exponents can be extracted: Utamaro (1753-1806) painted mainly prostitutes and erotic scenes ( shunga ). Sharaku (late eighteenth s) paint, t especially the major players knew Kabuki theater. Hokusai (1760-1849) also painted shunga but especially the one who introduced the landscape as a subject full of paint. Witness his thirty six Views of Mount Fuji.


Hiroshige finally (1797-1858) continues in landscape painting.
What they have in common: solid color, the ring, the rejection of perspective. A painting that goes back to the surface and which denies the illusion.

4. However, one should not exaggerate the influence of art Japanese on the Impressionists.
When Manet painting discovered (the cons i mage), he discovers that already Japanese painting is not concerned with illusionism.

The pointillist Post-Impressionist will take a step closer to the painting then towards abstraction.



III. TOWARD ABSTRACTION: THE DOTTED

1. The idea is to "rebuild" it will not say scientifically, but scientists (that is to say from a certain idea we have of science) Impressionism. Studies of Eugene Chevreul, Ogden Rood, Hermann von Helmholtz and Charles Henry of color are taken into account by Seurat.
2.The three primary colors exist in two forms. In the form of pigments their mixture gives a dark color turning to black. However, in the form of light rays , their synthesis is white. It follows that obtaining a color overlay pigments lose brightness. Instead, a color obtained by juxtaposition pigments gain in brightness. If the colored dots are juxtaposed small enough, the eye will make the canvas away from their "Mixture". Suffice it to juxtapose such as two primary colors to the eye, the "confusing" levies a secondary color. Thence pointillism (or divisionism) Seurat, for example.

Or Signac.




3. Pointillism, thereby radically changing the Impressionist collection time.
This is the moment Monet captured when considering its wheels or its water lilies. The moment of a particular luminosity. Or when Degas painted dancers or their horses' necks.

When Seurat painted his three models (The shrinkwrappers ), although it neither Venus nor comb heroines biblical he lot of time and frozen in their poses. Similarly walkers La Grande Jatte seem suspended in time almost stopped. Until the rider Cirque seems planted there on his horse forever.

is that the technique removes the dotted line flicker, the vibration of the key, giving life.



4. The Impressionists rejected the subject of the painting but kept the light. Pointillism still rejects good topic, but also the light, stepping closer to abstraction. It is for the viewer to reconstruct the vision.

5. It is the objective of pointillism is more intellectual than sensual. It is to make a synthesis perception. Presenting this rock no (like Monet) in this particular aspect it under some light at some point, but (as Seurat) in this aspect singular (that is to say that includes all aspects that can be taken under different lighting of the day or season), which is never visible (there never seen that particular), but behind his constant "visibility". This is a problem of this kind, by other means, Cezanne will face.

6. It goes Seurat (and Pointillist) as modern technique of the time. Eiffel Tower in finished work reveals the elements of its construction: iron bars, bolts. Also in the works pointillist, painting as a whole does not hide the items used to produce this set.


IV. NEW PROBLEMS FOR THE PAINTING

Table ceased to be a representation to become an object . The painting does not refer to an external reality, it exists for itself. It's a parallel reality.

This raises the issue of his organization.

1. Problem No. 1: The space

painting unfolds in space. But as a reality it must have a clean , separate space of external reality. The problem

painters will be primarily the construction of this space clean of the painting.

Cezanne and Cubism (Braque, Picasso)

2. Problem 2: Harmony

painting unfolds in the form of color and design. The problem

painters will therefore also that of a harmony, agreement-specific painting. (Also agree that things in external reality, because of their submission to the laws of nature, and things have to agree in the new reality of the painting).

Gauguin and Fauvism (Matisse, Derain ...)

3. Problem No. 3: The movement

Finally, this reality painting must have its own life.
This will be expressed in movement.

The futuristic abstraction (in some form)

CHAPTER 30: THE NEW WORLD OF THE PAINT 1. CONSTRUCTION OF SPACE (1): Cezanne (1).

I. PERSPECTIVE.

1. In the Middle Ages, the artwork is a text which decrypts the world conceived as the Book of the Mind of God.
The principle of consistency of this world lies in the symbolism . The smallest natural object
expresses Thought of the Creator (example: " Walnut St. Victor).

2. From the Renaissance, the world is a machine that science has to describe and reflect the art.
The artwork is a picture.
The principle of coherence of the world lies in the laws of nature, translated into paint by perspective.

3. In the modern age, the artwork is a creation which aims to explain how the world will become visible.
The principle of coherence in the world created by the art is discovered.

4. The problem is how to create a world.

a. What a world ? A coherent .

b. How to express significantly this consistency? By depth.

-> In the Middle Ages, the depth is symbolic . It sense symbol. It's behind the image (the eagle, for example), meaning (Saint John).
-> During the Renaissance, the depth is geometric : the perspective.
-> In the modern age, it is seeking a new depth. And as the depth of the Renaissance is on (there is the prospect objects against each other), one that has to invent new painting will be absolute . But what is an "absolute depth?

5. When I see a painting, I do not see one thing as another. I have, shall we say, a vision of "absolute". I see this table relative to the chair near the far door, etc.. (The view is relative). When I see a picture, I see that him.
Furthermore, I can ask, "Where is that thing? "But not" where is this picture? (Except me information on its location in the house or the museum). I can ask, "Where is the Sainte-Victoire mountain that Cezanne's painting represents what? "But not" where is this picture? .
The table is not a visible thing as the others.


So what do I see when I look La Montagne Sainte-Victoire by Cézanne . I do not see a mountain, what I see is the means by which this mountain is visible to me as a mountain and visible.

Emerging from the Cave Platonic, the released prisoner, he was accustomed to live in darkness and not see on the wall that the shadows cast from external things, sees the first effect of shadows and reflections of objects in the water, then the objects themselves and, finally, the sun.
In reaching the latter, however, it changes again to register. For if the sun is visible, it is also the principle of visibility of all things. Thanks to him than the rest becomes visible.
What happens with this picture of Cezanne is similar. The look first hung by the tree trunk shifts to the right on the lower branch is led away to the viaduct and bridge, finally, at the top of the mountain.
This, however, is very close. The painter's work has been to delay the eye. To impose detours. In this new depth is . As it is our view that is to say, to receive things.

Cezanne painted not the visible world, but the principle of visibility. The table explains how the world becomes visible to me.
Classic painted the world sprinkled with sunlight. The Impressionists painted the light preferably in the world. Cezanne painted the sun doing the training.


continued ... During the December 2, 2008

Quadriderm Nf Cream 40g

CEZANNE S CHAPTER 31 (continued) Construction of a space 1

CHAPTER 31: THE NEW WORLD OF THE PAINT 1. CONSTRUCTION OF SPACE (1): CEZANNE (continued). Jacques
rouveyrol




I. THE DARK PERIOD 1859-1871

Before the Renaissance perspective: the perspective of antiquity.
It is determined by the belief in the sphericity of the visual field and the belief in the fact that the apparent magnitudes are not a function of distance objects but a function of the visual angle :


Before the prospect of reviving research is done in manuscripts, from the theory of sphericity our vision. Hence, tile curve representations well illuminated.

1. Curiously, Cezanne begins by suggesting the depth through the curve. At this point in the canvas the starting point for a series of curves that radiate outwards, like the circles of the wave disturbed by a stone pier.




The depth is not made in color, but by the centrifugal movement curve . The focal point seems further away (as an origin) although no perspective does produce the illusion that depth.

2. Another method by irradiation leads to a similar result: a bright focal point and a gradual darkening centrifuge. With
resulting in a reversal of the "depth". The "home" to the forefront and lead the rest back into the shadows.


3. Even use of the curve in portraits to emerge "forward" the character or that detail of his face: he is turning the color .



II. The Impressionist period 1873-1877
We saw it with Impressionism, the subject eventually to lose interest. This is the only light that counts. But the problem is that its synthesis .
be noted. Is a photograph of a dancer caught in action. Photography (with exceptions) will freeze the motion, stop. Ten photographs placed side by side will show the decomposition . We are in the analysis. But is now a painting by Degas, for example The Star or Dancer on stage (1878 Musée d'Orsay, Paris) The gesture is not fixed, its continuation, as preceding in time, are suggested. It is a synthesis . A look at the picture, I imagine the indivisible whole movement of the dancer.
1. Well, in his landscapes. Cézanne does not capture a moment of light, but performs the synthesis of a succession of bright moments.
The problem is: how does this synthesis. How the elements (instants varied light) does not crumble they? How to keep them together?
The answer is a subdivision canvas. Each portion of space becomes solid and encloses all the variations possible. The difference is significant with this landscape by Pissarro:


who enjoys an overall cohesion but that gives an instant view of its existence (that of a special light).
In the absence of this subdivision, the landscape dissolves.

2. As for the landscape, Cezanne research in the portrait, which remains through the change of expressions.
To keep all this diversity, the area surrounding the face should be foreign to him and close in on itself.

The key is light, moving without the impasto characteristics of the previous period. The volume must be contained and it is the role which the frames that do this.
Sometimes there is imbalance and the space around butt-face, fixes it ( Madame Cezanne in the Striped dress 1877). Or, conversely, that the figure is "falling apart" due to lack of "pressure" of space ( Self-portrait from the Phillips Collection in Washington 1878-1880). Signs that the solution of "compartmentalization" is not, perhaps, the last word in the question about synthesis.


III. THE CONSTRUCTIVE PERIOD 1879-1895

The problem to solve is that of unit construction of the merger between the container space and figurative content.

1. Gauguin found his solution: recreate a world with no relation to reality: that, hierarchical idols. As we are in a total recreational, we control all elements of the composition of this new world so that it becomes easy to ensure consistency (the depth meaning defined above).


2. Same type of solution for which recreates Seurat another world where everything seems suspended, where time has stopped or slowed much less.

3. It also happens to Cezanne, that is the case for example in its Mardi Gras recreate another world of dreams. But his goal is to make a transposition real-world painting.
But transpose is both maintain and exceed .

Take the real world, and from it, build another world equivalent. A world that is parallel to reality. Now that there is parallel, it is shown that in the world I can recognize the people I represent. Work
of abstraction, then, but controlled, referred to the real.
Therefore, they achieve a balance between the abstract construction and real perception. It is only in the transposition of the real world to that of painting.

Again, it happens that there is an imbalance. Either one is not quite as abstract in Bay L'Estaque (1885 Art Institute of Chicago). Either it is too much and we lost sight of reality as in Woman with coffee (1895 Musée d'Orsay Paris).
The gesture of his hands on the thighs is here if needed to the composition of space we can not envisage any changes. Same comment about the Portrait of Ambroise Vollard or Madame Cezanne in a yellow armchair (1893-1895 Art Institute of Chicago).
When balance is achieved, other things are possible for the figure that the global space without being affected. Thus in The artist's son, Paul (1885-1890 National Gallery of Art, Washington).

Thus, the transposition succeeds in painting when reconstruction involves all elements (space, volumes, illustrated) of reality, without contact with it is broken.

The ideal would be that the reconstruction is already enclosed or at least out in the real and perceived himself to a man (the painter) who can see.

IV. THE PERIOD 1895-1906 SYNTHETIC

is precisely the assumption made by Cezanne in his last period. The real itself appears as the evocation of a hidden system. It justifies itself and suggests that the transposition of painting works. The work is then given as a revelation of truth of reality.
1. In this Montagne Sainte-Victoire for Bibemus everything is transposed. Everything comes here first. Yet the path of light, which in real perception, indicates the depth, the better: is the same feeling that depth (the time it takes to go from front to back), the path of light, therefore, is suggested by the net. The look is idle.


2. In the still life, the affirmation of the volume Item must not stop the movement in depth. Object and space are the same species. Transitions are provided from one to another.
compare these two still lifes: 1. Still Life 1875-1877 Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York 2. Still Life 1895-1900 Barnes Foundation, Merion. The second responds to this new "vision" of things.




3. As for the figure, it becomes one with the space around it. ( Portrait or The Gardener Vallier 1900-1906)



4. This position Cézanne solves the problem of an original nude in a landscape.


aA Renaissance, the integration of the nude in the landscape becomes the prospect (anthropocentric).
b. In the classical age (XVII century), the unification is done in reverse from the landscape (Chick).
c. Cezanne unification occurs by transposition. Nothing separates essentially within the figure yet individualized. It is, in particular the success of many paintings depicting the Bathers. Below: Bathers 1894-1905 National Gallery, London

the center, slightly right, they seem to "break ground" on left, standing almost merges with the landscape (with the trunk inclined). The figures seem to do the same space as the landscape they inhabit.

CONCLUSION

is gradually Cezanne, therefore, invented a new space.
Movement Party, the curve (dark period), it comes to subdivision (Impressionist period) that is to say to a solidification of the space needed to hold together the changes it seeks to synthesize (variations light for landscapes, portraits of expression).
It comes to an abstract construction to translate the real world in painting (constructive period) with the objective of balancing the abstract construction and real perception. But it is in discovering
(candidate?) A prior order in the real but hidden it succeeds (synthetic period) to a total unification of space.

1.The medieval space, heterogeneous and consisted of "places". Therefore unitless .

2. Space reborn, homogeneous, has a geometric unit expressed by the prospect. It is a container (a "scene") which are (against each other, objects).

3. Space Cézanne, homogeneous, has a essential unity is that of the figure and its surroundings. There is more "object" but a "vibration" universal here and there gives rise to the figures.