often hesitate ... cowardice, ignorance or wisdom?
Do not take action, do not fall into the most basic terrorism or a real propaganda by deed, not making weapons, not to organize to dismiss of Richard, is it wisdom?
Is it because we know that in this context, however, so conducive to the desire of murder, that to do so would swells and repression would only worsen the situation?
Is this a chance for these leaders (shareholders of the CAC40, politiciens-laquais/représentants precedents, judges on the payroll, for journalists, club
The Century ", etc ...) to have as victims of violence sclerotic?
Was it part of their deliberate tactics to indoctrinate us to get used to kowtow? Probably not ... too complicated to plan. Whatever occasionally some people still gather to discuss a little business to do without dealing with the affairs of the earth, the convicts ... etc., etc..
In any case, if there is no such case had been Georges Besse 86, it is certainly not because the violence of the social and economic class war had become less clear. Instead, the class of rich (
to use the words of Warren Buffet ) leads the fight and the violence it used, it uses is systematic (systematic?) Aggressively, with this feeling of revenge that grows in the post-war period.
Despair engendered this sense of an inevitable end of "social gains
" a return to the precarious living conditions, should lead us to more violence. However, if it asserts itself in our daily in the heart of neighborhoods and social relations deteriorated, it does not target those responsible yet easily identifiable, and often clearly identified by the typical person.
Not that I regret the absence of radical targeted killing in political violence that would be likely to lead the good people against their leaders, I do not wish death on anyone. It's martyrs and it does not ultimately leads far, let's face it. But I really question how the depoliticization and deculturalization class has done its work and how we finally asshole.
fact remains that as part of our (re?) Conquest of our consciousness of class, (re?) Construction of a popular protest movement, we must know our enemies.
I would not in the original with this book. Its title is evocative. But it goes far beyond anti-Sarkozyism base that is fit to adopt when one wants to be on the ball in the wind, bath, in, hype.
The book is more a method Mimile to argue against the dominant cohort, and, while Sarkozy is the backbone of this cohort enjoy, this is not the only target and it is a system that is Here, peeled, explained, demonstrated, taken apart, revealed and denounced.
yet twenty years ago, everything was in the hushed, sheltered from view, and when a scandal broke out, it followed a resignation. The dressing is true. Others, disgraced for having made saplings were to suicide. There's the nice gesture nonetheless. Rare but beautiful. Old school that has had its day. The
nepotism, favoritism, corruption ... everything is almost in broad daylight, it will barely cover: only the language of wood and double talk are still underway, the rest no longer be needed. The Sarkozy era has finally buried the practice of camouflage of the older generation. Capitalist totalitarianism makes them immune to everything. Absolutely everything. "They" have any power.
But who are these "they"? How to materialize all this corruption and these benefits to dominant? And what exactly are dominant? What are their territories (and incidentally, what we do)?
Concrete examples, anecdotes far from being mere detail, a sociology of power relations and thus strength, and finally some suggestions (if they are not all convincing, they are awarded an exist , two to think a little bit) is basically what the authors propose.
A huge work covering all the business arrangements and stories revolving around the personalities of the clan Sarkozy. CAC40
leaders, judges, friends, counselors, social climbers of all kinds : What do they benefit in the era of all-capital? How they are advantaged and cherished by the rulers and especially by the government? The book (re?) Gives specific facts.
Where do they put on the scale of power but also on the map of Paris.
Parts nauseous, each example gives sardonite acute. For
who follows the incredible adventures of our government, many pages are used as booster shot. Nothing can surprise the anarchist believes the gaucho or total, but the microscope to study all aspects of this form of power can have an overall view of things. The
findings in a pattern of proposals (compulsory voting, simply ban multiple office ...) for initiating change can not convince all those for whom the institutions must be razed. For those who still pose questions and have a slim hope in the rapid changes, total and radical, they may find there some thoughts.
Nothing in these proposals do not short me really satisfied, but at the lack of feasible project immediately ...
Seminar "The names and appointment" 
