I turned the option to place your comments my dear comrades.
Why? Beh
because it gives me ideas of censorship, which admittedly is not super-classy ... So instead of opening a Pandora's box, I prefer to leave it finally closed.
collage I had:
- the poorly understood who do not are dipping my humor (at the same time ... ultimately, there ... ... I aheum captures ...),
- illiterate people who do not read well,
- criticism without interest
- unverifiable claims,
- unprovable accusations,
- opinions but funny off topic ...
Now, all that need answers, which themselves are likely to appeal more ... and frankly I do not feel like a forum or fader that kind of crap to moderate.
I'll nonetheless mostly what I read:
- in most cases I do not know personally groups. If so, I might add.
Generally the people I like are also "work" I'm interested for one reason or another. I am even less objective (even if a zine is not intended to be in my opinion)
- that for years my thoughts lead me to anarchopunk trends. BUT, my ears are not clogged, my eyes are not blinkered in short, I do not mean partisan.
I am perhaps even more challenging sometimes with people who are more on my wavelength than the others ... it is also perhaps because they / they have something to say and are more ... I will try to correct this defect.
- I can chronicle what I have here and the leaves of cabbage. So I can only trust myself to what I (cd, vinyl, book ...). On groups that do not include their words, I can not judge what I understand ... it obviously limits. I mention this lack in general ... you conclude what you want on my side I do not impute motives, although I find it regrettable.
I'm not a journalist, I can not and do not want to investigate to check for inconsistencies between the slings / attitudes / ideas / words. Unless this is obvious: a group "committed" to Epitaph, a group sponsored by anarcho the bank in his neighborhood, a group of crested reaction to the words, etc., etc..
- A group of your knowledge is a combo of posers thirsty for recognition? If I do know or Eve Adam you understand, I hope (if not go somewhere else, the web is great), that - I repeat - I do not trust that what I see and hear (not that one can tell me such and such, and certainly not an anonymous [ah, the joys of the computer], even if he is right ! ). And if, God forbid, these people make a good record, in addition to autoprod labels or punks, I feel bad to say anything but good!
Anyway do not worry, the day the group in question will drop the mask, I know the scalp with a rusty spoon.
If despite this attempt to explain, you're not my opinion: either you write me an email to plus77rien@yahoo.fr to explain things, build a semblance of dialogue, start a discussion with the minimum of courtesy that require social contact, or you Put your bile in a beautiful specimen, you carrez in foil in the output channels of your low-lying areas.
Ah ... and then: In my perfect world, and although it will also do with the idiots, to the nearly, tassels, Stakhanovists fainiasses and large, the posers and too shy, Babache and jerks, large, poor, the village idiots, and too highbrow, the not-anarchists (ah the cons), the not-punk (oh the idiots), mothers of families, buttons, syphilis, and my aunt ... with all this beautiful machine, stomping it, we explained, we tear each other ... but we speak, it will be good, you'll see.
Why? Beh
because it gives me ideas of censorship, which admittedly is not super-classy ... So instead of opening a Pandora's box, I prefer to leave it finally closed.
collage I had:
- the poorly understood who do not are dipping my humor (at the same time ... ultimately, there ... ... I aheum captures ...),
- illiterate people who do not read well,
- criticism without interest
- unverifiable claims,
- unprovable accusations,
- opinions but funny off topic ...
Now, all that need answers, which themselves are likely to appeal more ... and frankly I do not feel like a forum or fader that kind of crap to moderate.
I'll nonetheless mostly what I read:
- in most cases I do not know personally groups. If so, I might add.
Generally the people I like are also "work" I'm interested for one reason or another. I am even less objective (even if a zine is not intended to be in my opinion)
- that for years my thoughts lead me to anarchopunk trends. BUT, my ears are not clogged, my eyes are not blinkered in short, I do not mean partisan.
I am perhaps even more challenging sometimes with people who are more on my wavelength than the others ... it is also perhaps because they / they have something to say and are more ... I will try to correct this defect.
- I can chronicle what I have here and the leaves of cabbage. So I can only trust myself to what I (cd, vinyl, book ...). On groups that do not include their words, I can not judge what I understand ... it obviously limits. I mention this lack in general ... you conclude what you want on my side I do not impute motives, although I find it regrettable.
I'm not a journalist, I can not and do not want to investigate to check for inconsistencies between the slings / attitudes / ideas / words. Unless this is obvious: a group "committed" to Epitaph, a group sponsored by anarcho the bank in his neighborhood, a group of crested reaction to the words, etc., etc..
- A group of your knowledge is a combo of posers thirsty for recognition? If I do know or Eve Adam you understand, I hope (if not go somewhere else, the web is great), that - I repeat - I do not trust that what I see and hear (not that one can tell me such and such, and certainly not an anonymous [ah, the joys of the computer], even if he is right ! ). And if, God forbid, these people make a good record, in addition to autoprod labels or punks, I feel bad to say anything but good!
Anyway do not worry, the day the group in question will drop the mask, I know the scalp with a rusty spoon.
If despite this attempt to explain, you're not my opinion: either you write me an email to plus77rien@yahoo.fr to explain things, build a semblance of dialogue, start a discussion with the minimum of courtesy that require social contact, or you Put your bile in a beautiful specimen, you carrez in foil in the output channels of your low-lying areas.
Ah ... and then: In my perfect world, and although it will also do with the idiots, to the nearly, tassels, Stakhanovists fainiasses and large, the posers and too shy, Babache and jerks, large, poor, the village idiots, and too highbrow, the not-anarchists (ah the cons), the not-punk (oh the idiots), mothers of families, buttons, syphilis, and my aunt ... with all this beautiful machine, stomping it, we explained, we tear each other ... but we speak, it will be good, you'll see.
0 comments:
Post a Comment