Wii Super Mario Hint Movies

Collective Brazil

The Collective

Brazil met Nov. 12 with the participation of all its members, to define, from the psychoanalytic clinic, the axes of future work on the issue of appointment and the symbolic order in twenty-first century and the implications for treatment. What we mean by the symbolic order in psychoanalysis today?

What we mean by the symbolic order in a modernity where what does not work has no place? Contemporaneity has its requirements, certainly, and psychoanalysis must engage. Faced with the challenges presented, how to respond and how to build our clinic from an ethics charge?

The register of the symbolic order, we put in value and by reference to the question of the appointment is, by Jacques Alain Miller, equivalent to the theory of knowledge in the real world. In reality, this is a first step in the direction of knowledge in the real world.

Freud wanted with the drive, name something real. This poses a major difficulty in the last teaching of Lacan: that, according to Miller, "On the go mingle with the signifier, of the order of reality. "

Between appointment and symbolic order, there is a process, a specific point of agreement. The appointment is "an assumption that reality is consistent with the symbolic." It touches the real misfires involving the reference that does not stop moving. In the proper name, for example, there is a dimension of the reference, which always calls a complement. We have, in the proper name, an anchoring point between the symbolic and real from what we are left with the imaginary world as representation. Miller noted that if one does not assume the agreement of the symbolic and real, then we must introduce an act which can be observed that the major anchoring point which is the name of the father: "he who takes the act of appointment, and thereby linking the symbolic and real. "

because the appointment is an assumption, "the pastoral care of the symbolic and real," as Miller puts it, requires us to ask: what becomes reality in the knot? Which is it real? Miller gives us clues, trails to be explored: the real is excluded from the meaning it is off camera, "just a poor round of string as disjointed as the symbolic and the imaginary." Explicit what the phrase "beyond meaning". It is the sense of reality off leaving ajar the possibility of meaning on reality, know about reality, but always from the perspective of real meaning as excluded.

This last dimension of Lacan questions the link between the symbolic and the real and invites us to think from their disjunction, a relation of exteriority between the two is to say their failure to report.

The issues raised then the appointment and the symbolic order in this century and the implications for the treatment, we will deepen over the next two years, and address them through psychoanalytic treatment to be submitted by each according to his own practice.

We start our work by reading The Wolf Man to Freud, and the article by Jacques Alain Miller - Review of the NLS, No. 72 and No. 73 - The Man wolves.

At our next meeting each must submit his reflection in a small writing.

Next meeting January 21 21h 15
Freudian College, 75009 Paris 31 rue Navarino

For more information mariaeugenianabuco@noos.fr